People v. Roney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roney

222 A.D.2d 1114, 636 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14256

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 222 A.D.2d 1114 (People v. Roney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Roney, 222 A.D.2d 1114, 636 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds (see, CPL 30.30 [1]). The People’s delay in producing Rosario material, namely, the transcript of the Grand Jury minutes, did not affect the People’s readiness to proceed (see, People v Anderson, 66 NY2d 529, 536-537; People v Kindlon, 217 AD2d 793; cf., People v McKenna, 76 NY2d 59, 61). We fur[1115]*1115ther conclude that imposition of the maximum term of imprisonment for felony driving while intoxicated was neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds (see, CPL 30.30 [1]). The People’s delay in producing Rosario material, namely, the transcript of the Grand Jury minutes, did not affect the People’s readiness to proceed (see, People v Anderson, 66 NY2d 529, 536-537; People v Kindlon, 217 AD2d 793; cf., People v McKenna, 76 NY2d 59, 61). We fur[1115]*1115ther conclude that imposition of the maximum term of imprisonment for felony driving while intoxicated was neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 1114, 636 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roney-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack