People v. Roncone

156 A.D.2d 1001, 550 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16195

This text of 156 A.D.2d 1001 (People v. Roncone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Roncone, 156 A.D.2d 1001, 550 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the suppression court erred in denying his motion to suppress his pretrial identification. From our review of the record, we conclude that the suppression court correctly found that the pretrial identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive (see, Simmons v United States, 390 US 377, 384-386; People v Emmons, 123 AD2d 475, 476, Iv denied 69 NY2d 827).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — rape, first degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simmons v. United States
390 U.S. 377 (Supreme Court, 1968)
People v. Emmons
123 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A.D.2d 1001, 550 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roncone-nyappdiv-1989.