People v. Romo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Romo

305 A.D.2d 521, 758 N.Y.S.2d 835

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 12, 2003·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Tomei, J.), rendered December 20, 2000, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On the facts presented, the imposition of consecutive terms of imprisonment was legal (see Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; People v Gardner, 281 AD2d 558 [2001]; People v Roman, 215 AD2d 697, 698 [1995]). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Tomei, J.), rendered December 20, 2000, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On the facts presented, the imposition of consecutive terms of imprisonment was legal (see Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; People v Gardner, 281 AD2d 558 [2001]; People v Roman, 215 AD2d 697, 698 [1995]). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

People v. Romo, 305 A.D.2d 521, 758 N.Y.S.2d 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

305 A.D.2d 521 (People v. Romo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related