People v. Romer

292 N.E.2d 789, 31 N.Y.2d 919, 340 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 887
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 1972·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Entry and acceptance of the defendant’s plea of guilty to count three of the indictment in complete satisfaction thereof, constituted a disposition of the entire indictment. Thus, the County Court Avas without the poAver to entertain a further plea to that indictment absent a reinstatement thereof which could have been accomplished by permitting the defendant to withdraw his original plea of guilty to count three. (See, e.g., Code Crim. Pro., § 337; CPL 220.30, 220.60.)

[921]*921Since the County Court improperly accepted the defendant’s plea of guilty to the first count without allowing him to withdraw his original plea of guilty to the third count, the resentencing proceedings were invalid, and the case must be remanded to the County Court in accordance with the order of the Appellate Division.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Romer, 292 N.E.2d 789, 31 N.Y.2d 919, 340 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 887 (N.Y. 1972).

292 N.E.2d 789 (People v. Romer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Turane
2021 NY Slip Op 07071 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Blades
164 Misc. 2d 749 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)
O'Brien v. De Giammatteo
97 Misc. 2d 827 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Hyll
90 Misc. 2d 101 (Suffolk County District Court, 1977)