People v. Romano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Romano

68 A.D.2d 939

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Romano, 68 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County, each imposed December 8, 1975, upon his conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, on his plea of guilty, the sentences being prison terms of one year, with the sentences to run concurrently with each other and with a sentence imposed for violation of probation. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the period of incarceration to the time already served. As so modified, sentences affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County, each imposed December 8, 1975, upon his conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, on his plea of guilty, the sentences being prison terms of one year, with the sentences to run concurrently with each other and with a sentence imposed for violation of probation. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the period of incarceration to the time already served. As so modified, sentences affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.2d 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-romano-nyappdiv-1979.