People v. Romani

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. Romani

193 Ill. App. 291

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 9, 1915

DocketGen. No. 5,917

StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ill. App. 291 (People v. Romani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Romani, 193 Ill. App. 291 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court,

4. Intoxicating liquors, § 159*—when requested instruction as to intoxicating character of Seer should have 6een given. In a prosecution for the sale of intoxicating liquors in less quantities than one gallon, in violation of section 2 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. If 4601), an instruction requested by the defendant as to the necessity of sufficient proof that beer sold was intoxicating, and not root or other nonintoxicating beer, should have been given.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court,

4. Intoxicating liquors, § 159*—when requested instruction as to intoxicating character of Seer should have 6een given. In a prosecution for the sale of intoxicating liquors in less quantities than one gallon, in violation of section 2 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. If 4601), an instruction requested by the defendant as to the necessity of sufficient proof that beer sold was intoxicating, and not root or other nonintoxicating beer, should have been given.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 Ill. App. 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-romani-illappct-1915.