People v. Roman

82 A.D.3d 445, 917 N.Y.2d 865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roman. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 A.D.3d 1416

Opinion

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]). The court did not conflate the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by pleading guilty. Instead, in a separate part of the allocution, it explained that, in return for the negotiated disposition, defendant was additionally agreeing to waive his right to appeal, and defendant accepted that condition. Furthermore, defendant also signed a valid written waiver, in which he acknowledged, among other things, that he had discussed the waiver with counsel. This waiver forecloses defendant’s suppression claim. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, DeGrasse, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roman, 82 A.D.3d 445, 917 N.Y.2d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

82 A.D.3d 445 (People v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)