People v. Roman

43 A.D.3d 1275, 841 N.Y.S.2d 922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2007·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1276]*1276Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of bribing a witness (Penal Law § 215.00), defendant challenges the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution. Defendant failed to preserve that challenge for our review, however, inasmuch as he failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v White, 24 AD3d 1220 [2005], Iv denied 6 NY3d 820 [2006]). In any event, defendant’s challenge lacks merit. Present—Scudder, PJ., Martoche, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roman, 43 A.D.3d 1275, 841 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

43 A.D.3d 1275 (People v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Roman v. Griffin
89 A.D.3d 1247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)