Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Roman

People v. Roman

201 A.D.2d 933, 607 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2114
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roman. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 A.D.2d 562 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 1994·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that the court committed reversible error when it changed its Sandoval ruling (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) just before opening statements. Defendant failed to show that he was prejudiced by the change in the ruling, and thus reversal is not required (cf., People v Powe, 146 AD2d 718, 719, lv denied 73 NY2d 1020; see also, People v Bush, 187 AD2d 951, 952, lv denied 81 NY2d 882; People v Atkinson, 171 AD2d 430, lv denied 78 NY2d 961). We further reject defendant’s contention that the proof of physical injury is legally insufficient. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we conclude that the jury reasonably could have inferred that the victim suffered substantial pain as a result of a gunshot wound to his [934]*934knee that required surgery and a hospital stay of a week (see, e.g., People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726; cf., Matter of Philip A., 49 NY2d 198, 200). While the court erred in permitting the prosecutor to impeach his witness (see, CPL 60.35; People v Fitzpatrick, 40 NY2d 44, 51-52; People v Broadwater, 116 AD2d 1022), the error was harmless (see, People v Smith, 190 AD2d 1022, lv denied 81 NY2d 976). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court properly admitted the rifle and ammunition into evidence; there were " 'reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged condition’ of the evidence” (People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340, 343, quoting Amaro v City of New York, 40 NY2d 30, 35) and thus, any deficiencies in the chain of custody affect the weight of that evidence (see, People v McGee, 49 NY2d 48, 60, cert denied sub nom. Waters v New York, 446 US 942; People v Donovan, 141 AD2d 835, 837, lv denied 72 NY2d 1044).

Defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal are unpreserved and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roman, 201 A.D.2d 933, 607 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 933 (People v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Amaro v. City of New York
351 N.E.2d 665 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Fitzpatrick
351 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. McGee
399 N.E.2d 1177 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
In re Philip A.
400 N.E.2d 358 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Rojas
460 N.E.2d 1100 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Broadwater
116 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Donovan
141 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Powe
146 A.D.2d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Atkinson
171 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Bush
187 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Smith
190 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Waters v. New York
446 U.S. 942 (Supreme Court, 1980)