People v. Roman

151 A.D.2d 619, 543 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7965
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roman. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D.2d 305

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), rendered June 30, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). The conflicting testimony adduced at trial merely created an issue of credibility which was resolved by the jury (People v Shapiro, 117 AD2d 688).

Finally, we have reviewed the defendant’s remaining argument concerning the alleged excessiveness of his sentence, and find it to be without merit (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roman, 151 A.D.2d 619, 543 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

151 A.D.2d 619 (People v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Shapiro
117 A.D.2d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)