People v. Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roman

121 A.D.2d 482, 503 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58456

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 A.D.2d 482 (People v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Roman, 121 A.D.2d 482, 503 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered September 16, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, and bearing in mind that issues of credibility are primarily for the jury to resolve, the evidence is of sufficient quantity and quality to support the verdict (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 US 932; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered September 16, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, and bearing in mind that issues of credibility are primarily for the jury to resolve, the evidence is of sufficient quantity and quality to support the verdict (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 US 932; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 482, 503 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roman-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack