People v. Roman
This text of 38 A.D.2d 734 (People v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, entered February 24,1971, which denied the application without a hearing. Order affirmed. No opinion. Munder, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur; Rabin, P. J., and Hopkins, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to grant the application to the extent of directing that a hearing be held on defendant’s allegations, with the following memorandum : Defendant’s allegations entitle him to a hearing. The record does not conclusively refute his contentions; nor are his allegations incredible as a matter of law (People v. Bagley, 23 N Y 2d 814).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A.D.2d 734, 329 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roman-nyappdiv-1972.