People v. Rolling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rolling

204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 172

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rolling. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D.2d 973 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), imposed August 19, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), imposed August 19, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Rolling, 204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

204 A.D.2d 496 (People v. Rolling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related