People v. Rolling
This text of 204 A.D.2d 496 (People v. Rolling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), imposed August 19, 1992.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).
We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rolling-nyappdiv-1994.