People v. Rolling

204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 172

This text of 204 A.D.2d 496 (People v. Rolling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rolling, 204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), imposed August 19, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rolling-nyappdiv-1994.