People v. Roldan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roldan

99 A.D.2d 410, 470 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16567

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 410 (People v. Roldan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Roldan, 99 A.D.2d 410, 470 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinions

Judgment, Supreme Court (Dickens, J.), rendered April 7,1981, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of kidnapping in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, and criminal possession in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of from 6 to 12 years on the kidnapping count and from 2 to 4 years on the unlawful imprisonment charge and an unconditional charge on the weapons count. This appeal was held in abeyance and the matter was remanded for a hearing before the trial court so that the transcript could be settled (96 AD2d 476). The evidence presented at the hearing supports the trial court’s conclusion that its charge, as actually given to the jury, did not contain the errors found in the stenographic minutes but was a correct presentation of the law on those points. Since we find no merit to the other issues raised by defendant, we affirm his judgment of conviction. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court (Dickens, J.), rendered April 7,1981, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of kidnapping in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, and criminal possession in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of from 6 to 12 years on the kidnapping count and from 2 to 4 years on the unlawful imprisonment charge and an unconditional charge on the weapons count. This appeal was held in abeyance and the matter was remanded for a hearing before the trial court so that the transcript could be settled (96 AD2d 476). The evidence presented at the hearing supports the trial court’s conclusion that its charge, as actually given to the jury, did not contain the errors found in the stenographic minutes but was a correct presentation of the law on those points. Since we find no merit to the other issues raised by defendant, we affirm his judgment of conviction. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 410, 470 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roldan-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack