People v. Rojas

108 A.D.3d 576, 967 N.Y.S.2d 837
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed March 28, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740 [2007]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rojas, 108 A.D.3d 576, 967 N.Y.S.2d 837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

108 A.D.3d 576 (People v. Rojas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fuentes
109 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)