People v. Rojas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rojas

105 A.D.3d 977, 962 N.Y.S.2d 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.3d 977 (People v. Rojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rojas, 105 A.D.3d 977, 962 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), imposed March 3, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI