People v. Roides
This text of 124 A.D.2d 967 (People v. Roides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: In this prosecution for arson and assault, the court properly received evidence of defendant’s prior uncharged crimes and bad acts on the People’s case-in-chief. Evidence of prior uncharged crimes is admissible if it is directly probative of some issue in the case (People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350, 359; People v Vails, 43 NY2d 364, 368). Here, the evidence established that defendant smashed his wife’s car windows; slashed her tires; broke two windows on the house in which she was living; threatened to give her a [968]*968"good beating”, to cut her throat, and to put her and her friends in their graves. Thus, the evidence of defendant’s threats and acts of violence toward his wife in the month preceding the crime was directly probative of his intent to set fire to his wife’s house and the possible motive for doing so.
We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Bergin, J. — assault, first degree, and arson, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.2d 967, 508 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roides-nyappdiv-1986.