People v. Rogers

81 A.D.3d 1441, 916 N.Y.S.2d 879
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rogers. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.D.3d 457

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), entered June 15, 2009. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v Gilbert, 78 AD3d 1584, 1585-1586 [2010]; People v Kelley, 64 AD3d 1192 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 708 [2009]). In any event, that contention lacks merit inasmuch as defendant failed to “ ‘present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances justifying a downward departure’ ” (People v Clark, 66 AD3d 1366, 1367 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 713 [2009]; see People v Sawyer, 78 AD3d 1517 [2010]). Present— Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rogers, 81 A.D.3d 1441, 916 N.Y.S.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

81 A.D.3d 1441 (People v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kelley
64 A.D.3d 1192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Clark
66 A.D.3d 1366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Sawyer
78 A.D.3d 1517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Gilbert
78 A.D.3d 1584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)