People v. Rogers

179 Cal. 818
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 24, 1919
DocketCrim. No. 2206
StatusPublished

This text of 179 Cal. 818 (People v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rogers, 179 Cal. 818 (Cal. 1919).

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment pronounced on a conviction of murder in the first degree, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The record is in all material respects the same as that in People v. Rollins, ante, p. 793, [179 Pac. 209], The defendant and said Rollins were jointly engaged in the robbery of one Allen, and in the perpetration of that robbery killed Allen. The points made for reversal are the same as those made in that ease. For the reasons stated in the opinion therein those points must be held to be without merit. Examination of the record discloses no ground for reversal.

, The judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed.

Melvin, J., Shaw, J., Sloss, J., Wilbur, J., Lawlor, J., Lennon, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rollins
179 P. 209 (California Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 Cal. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rogers-cal-1919.