People v. Roebuck
Opinion
| People v Roebuck |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 03063 |
| Decided on June 5, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 5, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
BARRY E. WARHIT
JANICE A. TAYLOR
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.
2022-02848
2022-03442
v
Edgar Roebuck, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 713/18, 3540/18)
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Leila Hull of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny K. Chun, J.), both imposed March 10, 2022, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., WOOTEN, WARHIT, TAYLOR and LOVE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2024 NY Slip Op 03063 (People v. Roebuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.