People v. Roe

5 Park. Cr. 231
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Park. Cr. 231 (People v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Roe, 5 Park. Cr. 231 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1862).

Opinion

Rosekrans, J.

An indictment might have been found the first term after the commission of the offense. It was not material, so far as the finding and presentment of the bill was concerned, where the defendant might be. The finding and presentment of this indictment is all the statute requires to.- , save the rights of the people. We are of opinion that the plea is good, and there must be judgment for the defendant.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kohut
282 N.E.2d 312 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
People v. Kaplan
143 Misc. 91 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Park. Cr. 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roe-nysupct-1862.