People v. Roe
5 Park. Cr. 231
Opinion
An indictment might have been found the first term after the commission of the offense. It was not material, so far as the finding and presentment of the bill was concerned, where the defendant might be. The finding and presentment of this indictment is all the statute requires to.- , save the rights of the people. We are of opinion that the plea is good, and there must be judgment for the defendant.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Roe, 5 Park. Cr. 231 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1862).
5 Park. Cr. 231 (People v. Roe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Kohut
282 N.E.2d 312 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
People v. Kaplan
143 Misc. 91 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1932)