People v. Rodriquez

109 A.D.2d 807, 486 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47310
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 A.D.2d 847

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), both rendered October 29,1982, convicting him of assault in the first degree and attempted assault in the first degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriquez, 109 A.D.2d 807, 486 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

109 A.D.2d 807 (People v. Rodriquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)