People v. Rodriguez

56 Misc. 2d 576, 289 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1852
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 5, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was error to condition eligibility for youthful offender treatment upon a plea of guilty. The youthful offender statutes authorize the court to determine eligibility for such treatment irrespective of the plea (Code Crim. Pro., § 913-g), and a defendant may not be precluded from pleading his innocence and insisting upon a trial. Basic considerations of fairness to an accused prevent the imposition of a condition to a determination of eligibility for youthful offender treatment.

The judgment adjudicating the defendant a youthful offender should be reversed on the law and on the facts, the plea vacated, and the case remanded to the court below for repleading and further appropriate proceedings.

Concur — Hecht, Jr., J. P., Gold and Hofstadter, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 56 Misc. 2d 576, 289 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

56 Misc. 2d 576 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Soto
64 Misc. 2d 515 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)