People v. Rodriguez

2019 NY Slip Op 2123
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.3d 489
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2019·No. Ind. No. 5447/10·Published

Opinion

People v Rodriguez (2019 NY Slip Op 02123)
People v Rodriguez
2019 NY Slip Op 02123
Decided on March 20, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 20, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2014-08727
(Ind. No. 5447/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Eduardo P. Rodriguez, appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Justine M. Luongo and Lorraine Maddalo of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, and Michael L. Brenner of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Foley, J.), rendered February 3, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and thus, constitutes a mixed claim of ineffective assistance (see People v Maxwell, 89 AD3d 1108, 1109). In this case, it is not evident from the matter appearing on the record that the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Hili, 158 AD3d 647, 648). Since the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the claim in its entirety (see People v Hili, 158 AD3d at 648; People v Freeman, 93 AD3d 805, 806).

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 2019 NY Slip Op 2123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 2123 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maxwell
89 A.D.3d 1108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Freeman
93 A.D.3d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)