People v. Rodriguez

2018 NY Slip Op 6571
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 A.D.3d 1181
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 2018·No. 2016-12505·Published

Opinion

People v Rodriguez (2018 NY Slip Op 06571)
People v Rodriguez
2018 NY Slip Op 06571
Decided on October 3, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 3, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

2016-12505
(Ind. No. 1902/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Juan Rodriguez, appellant.


Judah Maltz, Kew Gardens, NY, for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Judith R. Sternberg and Hilda Mortensen of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Meryl J. Berkowitz, J.), rendered November 16, 2016, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, perjury in the first degree, perjury in the second degree (two counts), tampering with physical evidence (two counts), making a punishable false written statement (two counts), criminal contempt in the second degree (two counts), and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342; People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 2018 NY Slip Op 6571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 6571 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mateo
811 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)