People v. Rodriguez

149 A.D.3d 1590, 51 N.Y.S.3d 467
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 1182

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered November 12, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree and attempted burglary in the second degree.

[1591]*1591It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [b]) and attempted burglary in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, his waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence. The record establishes that he voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived the right to appeal from all aspects of his case, including his sentence, and that he was informed of the maximum sentence County Court could impose (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]).

Present — Whalen, P.J., Carni, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 149 A.D.3d 1590, 51 N.Y.S.3d 467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

149 A.D.3d 1590 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)