People v. Rodriguez

136 A.D.3d 549, 24 N.Y.S.3d 907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 18, 2016·No. 260 40/12·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J., at hearing; Patricia Nunez, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered May 23, 2013, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Even if there were any ambiguity in the sentencing court’s colloquy, defendant executed a detailed written waiver and indicated his assent to the appeal waiver. Thus, defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal {People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]), which forecloses review of his suppression and excessive sentence claims.

Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we find that the court properly denied his suppression motion. The record fails to support defendant’s claim that the voluntariness of his statement was affected by intoxication. Defendant’s claim that a detective obtained the statement by means of misleading remarks is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We similarly reject defendant’s excessive sentence claim.

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 136 A.D.3d 549, 24 N.Y.S.3d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 549 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bonilla
2022 NY Slip Op 07304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)