People v. Rodriguez

46 A.D.3d 356, 846 N.Y.S.2d 907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J., at plea; Seth L. Marvin, J, at sentence), rendered May 19, 2006, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, which forecloses review of his present claim that the court should have exercised its discretion to give him a second chance to complete drug treatment, notwithstanding his conceded violation of his plea agreement (see People v Wilson, 11 AD3d 206 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 743 [2004]). Were we to find otherwise, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion, especially since defendant immediately absconded after being directed to enter a drug program, and was also arrested and convicted of a new crime (see People v Valles, 21 AD3d 855 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 760 [2005]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 46 A.D.3d 356, 846 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 356 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McMillan
112 A.D.3d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. McKay
106 A.D.3d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)