People v. Rodriguez

290 A.D.2d 521, 736 N.Y.S.2d 271, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 586
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 A.D.2d 1040

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), rendered December 5, 2000, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision whether to permit the withdrawal of a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court (see, People v Ramsingh, 267 AD2d 406). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea (see, People v Garcia, 92 NY2d 869; People v Marzocco, 278 AD2d 515; People v Eschenberg, 275 AD2d 719). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 290 A.D.2d 521, 736 N.Y.S.2d 271, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

290 A.D.2d 521 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Garcia
700 N.E.2d 311 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Eschenberg
275 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Marzocco
278 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Ramsingh
267 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)