People v. Rodriguez

289 A.D.2d 60, 733 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12111
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 A.D.2d 1040

Opinion

Judgment, [61]*61Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), rendered April 14, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court erred in refusing the jury’s request for a readback of defense counsel’s summation (People v Velasco, 77 NY2d 469, 474). However, upon review of the record, we find that defendant was not seriously prejudiced by the court’s response to the jury’s request (see, People v Lourido, 70 NY2d 428, 435).

Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to be present during a readback of testimony (see, People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136). The record establishes that defense counsel spoke to defendant, who then agreed to waive his right to be present. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Andrias, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 289 A.D.2d 60, 733 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

289 A.D.2d 60 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Parker
440 N.E.2d 1313 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Lourido
516 N.E.2d 1212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Velasco
570 N.E.2d 1070 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)