People v. Rodriguez

254 A.D.2d 95, 680 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10687
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered July 5, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 6 years to life and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The subject warrant, which contained both a correct and incorrect street address on its face, was valid under the circumstances since “there was no reasonable possibility that the wrong premises would be searched regardless of the error contained in the warrant” (People v Graham, 220 AD2d 769, 772, lv denied 89 NY2d 942). The affidavit in support of the warrant application listed the correct address three times and the officer who both applied for and executed the warrant had personal knowledge of the place to be searched, making it inconceivable that he would have searched a premises more than 100 blocks away as a result of an obvious typographical error. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 254 A.D.2d 95, 680 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 95 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Trulove
2025 NY Slip Op 01178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
State v. Rogers
2008 WI App 176 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2008)
People v. Gramson
50 A.D.3d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Hampton
603 N.W.2d 270 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1999)