People v. Rodriguez

232 A.D.2d 662, 648 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11294
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 28, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), [663]*663rendered July 12, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court’s circumstantial evidence charge adequately conveyed to the jury the principle that the evidence had to exclude beyond a reasonable doubt every hypothesis of innocence (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428; People v Sanchez, 61 NY2d 1022; People v Marsalis, 189 AD2d 897). The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 232 A.D.2d 662, 648 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 662 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brewster
48 A.D.3d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. McDonald
287 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Rojas
240 A.D.2d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)