People v. Rodriguez

212 A.D.2d 743, 623 N.Y.S.2d 157
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 181 A.D.2d 841

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings [744]*744County (Beldock, J.), rendered June 28, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under Indictment No. 933/93, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a term of imprisonment upon his prior conviction under Indictment No. 11784/89.

Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 212 A.D.2d 743, 623 N.Y.S.2d 157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 743 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)