People v. Rodriguez
140 A.D.2d 467, 528 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4924
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 A.D.2d 337 →
Opinion
[468]*468The defendant contends on appeal that the trial court made denigrating remarks directed at his counsel in the presence of the jury which denied him a fair trial. We disagree. The only remark to which contemporaneous objection was raised was sufficiently cured by an instruction to the jury to "[p]ay no attention to colloquy between Judges and lawyers” but rather to "make the decision on the evidence and lack of evidence”. Weinstein, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rodriguez, 140 A.D.2d 467, 528 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 467 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.