People v. Rodriguez

131 A.D.2d 605, 516 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48071
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 A.D.2d 832

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J.), rendered May 11, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have also considered the defendant’s contention raised in his pro se brief and find it to be without merit (see, People v Crespo, 70 AD2d 661; see also, People v Cantre, 95 AD2d 522, 526, affd 65 NY2d 790 on opn of Mollen, P. J., at App Div.) Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 131 A.D.2d 605, 516 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

131 A.D.2d 605 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Cantre
482 N.E.2d 923 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Crespo
70 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Cantre
95 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)