People v. Rodriguez

125 A.D.2d 507, 509 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62811
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 A.D.2d 832

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lentol, J.), rendered April 30, 1976, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as we must (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 US 932; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that the defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 125 A.D.2d 507, 509 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

125 A.D.2d 507 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Malizia
465 N.E.2d 364 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)