People v. Rodriguez

434 N.E.2d 1340, 56 N.Y.2d 557, 449 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3231
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 1982·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We cannot say on the facts of this case that the Trial Judge’s denial of defendant’s application for a second competency hearing was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law, either under CPL 730.30 or 730.60 (subd 2) as it read at the time of defendant’s trial.

The other error alleged, not having been preserved for review by appropriate objection or request for curative instruction, is beyond our power of review.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 434 N.E.2d 1340, 56 N.Y.2d 557, 449 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3231 (N.Y. 1982).

434 N.E.2d 1340 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Davenport
58 A.D.3d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Morgan
662 N.E.2d 260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Delgado
202 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Wiggins
191 A.D.2d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Rogers
159 A.D.2d 231 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. McGarrity
130 A.D.2d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Christopher
65 N.Y. 417 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Cox
93 A.D.2d 946 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Coker
90 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)