People v. Rodriguez
316 N.E.2d 342, 34 N.Y.2d 833, 359 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1498
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 N.Y.2d 95 →
Opinion
Order affirmed in the following memorandum: On this record, the proof independent of the testimony of the five-year-old child was sufficient to make out a circumstantial case. Consequently, there is no further material question of law for this court to review. The child’s examination, taken without her being sworn, was received for whatever value it had under proper instructions to the jury.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rodriguez, 316 N.E.2d 342, 34 N.Y.2d 833, 359 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1498 (N.Y. 1974).
316 N.E.2d 342 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.