People v. Rodney (Raymond)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedSeptember 12, 2016
Docket2016 NYSlipOp 51272(U)
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Rodney (Raymond) (People v. Rodney (Raymond)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rodney (Raymond), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Raymond Rodney, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered August 8, 2013, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered August 8, 2013, reversed, on the law, and accusatory instrument dismissed.

Reversal of the judgment convicting defendant of disorderly conduct and dismissal of that charge is mandated since, as the People concede, the allegations in the accusatory instrument were jurisdictionally insufficient to meet the elements of disorderly conduct (see People v Jones, 9 NY3d 259, 262 [2007]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: September 12, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Jones
878 N.E.2d 1016 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Rodney (Raymond), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rodney-raymond-nyappterm-2016.