People v. Rodgers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rodgers

182 A.D.2d 1137, 586 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A.D.2d 1137 (People v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rodgers, 182 A.D.2d 1137, 586 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant to a term of 2-⅓ to 7 years in a State correctional facility upon his guilty plea to one count of sexual abuse in the first degree in satisfaction of all charges against him. The defendant was specifically informed by the court at the time of his plea of the possible sentence and acknowledged that he understood it. In light of the violent nature of the crime and defendant’s extensive criminal record, the maximum sentence is not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant to a term of 2-⅓ to 7 years in a State correctional facility upon his guilty plea to one count of sexual abuse in the first degree in satisfaction of all charges against him. The defendant was specifically informed by the court at the time of his plea of the possible sentence and acknowledged that he understood it. In light of the violent nature of the crime and defendant’s extensive criminal record, the maximum sentence is not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A.D.2d 1137, 586 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rodgers-nyappdiv-1992.