People v. Rodgers

124 A.D.2d 1003, 509 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62331

This text of 124 A.D.2d 1003 (People v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rodgers, 124 A.D.2d 1003, 509 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Memorandum: The evidence in the record is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict convicting defendant of rape and sodomy. The standard of reasonable resistance is applicable, not that of utmost resistance (see, L 1977, ch 692). Moreover, the error in the sentencing minutes is of no consequence since the minimum sentence is fixed by law at one third of the maximum (Penal Law § 70.02 [3] [a]; [4]). We find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed by the court. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Wolfgang, J. — rape, first degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 70.02
New York PEN § 70.02

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.2d 1003, 509 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rodgers-nyappdiv-1986.