Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Roden

People v. Roden

30 A.D.3d 543, 816 N.Y.S.2d 360
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 13, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.3d 543 (People v. Roden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Roden, 30 A.D.3d 543, 816 N.Y.S.2d 360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Appeal by the [544]*544defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered March 8, 2005, convicting.him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that his sentence was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Ackerman, 11 AD3d 473 [2004]). The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [4]; § 1193 [1] [c] [i]). Florio, J.E, Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ackerman
11 A.D.3d 473 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 543, 816 N.Y.S.2d 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roden-nyappdiv-2006.