People v. Roden
This text of 235 N.E.2d 776 (People v. Roden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed in the following memorandum: We agree with the trial court that coram nobis does not lie under the circumstances herein. We note, however, that we disagree with its conclusion that an unloaded gun is not a dangerous weapon within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 2124 of the former Penal Law. Of course, to this extent we also disagree with the holding in People v. Ahmed (27 A D 2d 729, revd. on other grounds 20 N Y 2d 958).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 N.E.2d 776, 21 N.Y.2d 810, 288 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roden-ny-1968.