People v. Roden
235 N.E.2d 776, 21 N.Y.2d 810, 288 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1613
Opinion
Order affirmed in the following memorandum: We agree with the trial court that coram nobis does not lie under the circumstances herein. We note, however, that we disagree with its conclusion that an unloaded gun is not a dangerous weapon within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 2124 of the former Penal Law. Of course, to this extent we also disagree with the holding in People v. Ahmed (27 A D 2d 729, revd. on other grounds 20 N Y 2d 958).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Roden, 235 N.E.2d 776, 21 N.Y.2d 810, 288 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1613 (N.Y. 1968).
235 N.E.2d 776 (People v. Roden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Knowles
79 A.D.2d 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Tracey A.
97 Misc. 2d 1053 (New York County Courts, 1979)
People v. Briggs
52 A.D.2d 1053 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Archie
85 Misc. 2d 243 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)