People v. Rockwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rockwell

253 A.D.2d 941, 678 N.Y.S.2d 920

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 17, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 941 (People v. Rockwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rockwell, 253 A.D.2d 941, 678 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered April 14, 1997, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a term of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated as a felony and was sentenced to five years’ probation. When he subsequently pleaded guilty to violating the terms of his probation, defendant’s probation was revoked and he was resentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defense counsel now seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered April 14, 1997, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a term of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated as a felony and was sentenced to five years’ probation. When he subsequently pleaded guilty to violating the terms of his probation, defendant’s probation was revoked and he was resentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defense counsel now seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 941, 678 N.Y.S.2d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rockwell-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack