People v. Rochester
179 A.D.2d 829
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1992
StatusPublished
This text of 179 A.D.2d 829 (People v. Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Rochester, 179 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
The defendant’s claim that the resentence violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Eiber, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rochester-nyappdiv-1992.