People v. Roche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roche

252 A.D.2d 459, 675 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8674

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 30, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D.2d 459 (People v. Roche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Roche, 252 A.D.2d 459, 675 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about December 5, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of robbery in the first degree (8 counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to 8 concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years concurrent with a term of 7V2 to 15 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentences to 8 concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years concurrent with a term of 4V2 to 9 years, and otherwise affirmed.

[460]*460We find the sentences excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Nardelli, Wallach, Williams and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about December 5, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of robbery in the first degree (8 counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to 8 concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years concurrent with a term of 7V2 to 15 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentences to 8 concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years concurrent with a term of 4V2 to 9 years, and otherwise affirmed.

[460]*460We find the sentences excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Nardelli, Wallach, Williams and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D.2d 459, 675 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roche-nyappdiv-1998.