People v. Roche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roche

92 A.D.2d 576, 459 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16821

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered January 11,1982, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of operating a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition, as a felony, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered January 11,1982, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of operating a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition, as a felony, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

People v. Roche, 92 A.D.2d 576, 459 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

92 A.D.2d 576 (People v. Roche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related