People v. Rocha

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Rocha

164 N.W.2d 680, 13 Mich. App. 596, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1107

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 21, 1968

DocketDocket 4,549

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 164 N.W.2d 680 (People v. Rocha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rocha, 164 N.W.2d 680, 13 Mich. App. 596, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1107 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was tried by a jury on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon, CL *597 1948, §750.82 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.277), and lie was convicted. Defendant represented himself at trial because the trial judge denied a request for appointed counsel. On appeal, defendant questions the propriety of this denial. It is only proper if the record discloses that defendant was financially able to provide counsel. GrCR 1963, 785.3(1).

"We are unable to' say on this ré'córd that defendant was financially able to hire his own attorney. In spite of the commendable efforts'of the trial judge and the prosecuting attorney to assuré defendant a fair trial, the record before us demonstrates this did not occur. ' :■

The problem presented by this appeal has been, is and will be one of the most recurrent and troublesome that the trial bench must face. Any attempt by this Court to furnish guide lines in this area would create more problems than it would solve. Each case is a separate problem, and adequate review is only possible on an adequate record. Trial of a criminal defendant without counsel always entails risk.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Quinn, P. J., and Holbrook and Vander Wal, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI