People v. Robles (Khalil)

76 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50956(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2022
Docket570411/19
StatusUnpublished

This text of 76 Misc. 3d 136(A) (People v. Robles (Khalil)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Robles (Khalil), 76 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50956(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Robles (2022 NY Slip Op 50956(U)) [*1]

People v Robles (Khalil)
2022 NY Slip Op 50956(U) [76 Misc 3d 136(A)]
Decided on September 30, 2022
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on September 30, 2022
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Brigantti, J.P., Tisch, Michael, JJ.
570411/19

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Khalil Robles, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Frances Y. Wang, J.), rendered March 25, 2019, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Frances Y. Wang, J.),rendered March 25, 2019, affirmed.

Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, and assuming that CPL 420.35(2-a), which permits the waiver of surcharges and fees for persons who, like defendant, were less than 21 years old at the time of the crime, applies retroactively (see People v Zapata, 205 AD3d 740 [2022], lv granted — NY3d —, 2022 NY Slip Op 98026[U]; People v Dyshawn B., 196 AD3d 638 [2021]), we do not find that vacatur of the surcharge and fees as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice would be appropriate in this case (see People v Nunez, 203 AD3d 476 [2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 1073 [2022]; People v Escalona, 202 AD3d 451 [2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 1070 [2022]).

All concur

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Clerk of the Court
Decision Date: September 30, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Santana v. Pena
2021 NY Slip Op 04486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Nunez
203 A.D.3d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Zapata
205 A.D.3d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50956(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robles-khalil-nyappterm-2022.