People v. Robinson

2024 NY Slip Op 00438
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2024
DocketInd. No. 2352/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 00438 (People v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Robinson, 2024 NY Slip Op 00438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Robinson (2024 NY Slip Op 00438)
People v Robinson
2024 NY Slip Op 00438
Decided on January 31, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 31, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
HELEN VOUTSINAS
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2020-01034
(Ind. No. 2352/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Matthew Robinson, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott, and Michael Tadros of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Barry A. Schwartz, J.), rendered January 8, 2020, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Although it is undisputed that the defendant was 18 years old at the time the underlying offense was committed, the record does not demonstrate that a waiver of the mandatory surcharge and fees was warranted under any of the grounds enumerated in CPL 420.35(2-a). Under the circumstances, and in the absence of the People's consent, we decline to waive the surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing in the interest of justice (see People v Dorfils, 207 AD3d 654, 654-655; People v Miller, 206 AD3d 940, 941; People v Attah, 203 AD3d 1063, 1064).

LASALLE, P.J., MALTESE, VOUTSINAS and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Attah
203 A.D.3d 1063 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 00438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robinson-nyappdiv-2024.