People v. Robinson

2017 NY Slip Op 666, 147 A.D.3d 786, 45 N.Y.S.3d 802
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2017·No. 2014-08911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), imposed September 3, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was *787 invalid (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925 [2012]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Hall, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 2017 NY Slip Op 666, 147 A.D.3d 786, 45 N.Y.S.3d 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 666 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Robinson
29 N.Y.3d 1036 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)